Fideum vs Fireblocks
How Fideum vs Fireblocks compare on our ratings, custodian specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 2.3/5 | 4.3/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Security | 2.5 | 4.0 |
| Compliance | 1.5 | 4.0 |
| Asset support | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| Features | 3.5 | 4.5 |
| Support | 2.5 | 4.0 |
| Specs | ||
| KYC required | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Custody model | Not disclosed | Qualified custodian, MPC, HSM, Self-custody software |
| Clients | Institutions, Funds, Corporates | Institutions, Funds, Corporates |
| Regulated | Not disclosed | Yes |
| SOC 2 report | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Staking | Yes | Yes |
| API access | Yes | Yes |
| Licenses & charters | Not disclosed | NYDFS limited purpose trust charter (US), FinCEN MSB registration (US), State money transmitter licenses in 37 states and DC (US) |
| MPC | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Cold storage | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Qualified custodian | No | Yes |
| Company | ||
| Founded | — | — |
| Headquarters | United Kingdom | United States |
| Investors | Valereum PLC | D1 Capital Partners, Spark Capital |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Fintechs and brokerages adding custody, trading and staking through one API, Banks and credit unions that already contract a licensed custodian and want key-management software, Payment firms settling in stablecoins and fiat across Fideum's 11 listed currencies | Exchanges and payment companies building in-house custody, Funds and RIAs that need a New York qualified custodian, Fintechs launching embedded or white-label wallets |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

