ether.fi vs Marinade
How ether.fi vs Marinade compare on our ratings, staking protocol specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 4.0/5 | 4.3/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Yield | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Security | 3.5 | 4.5 |
| Liquidity | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| Decentralization | 3.5 | 4.5 |
| Ease of use | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Specs | ||
| KYC required | No | No |
| Type | Liquid restaking | Liquid staking, Native staking |
| Stakeable assets | ETH | SOL |
| Receipt token | eETH / weETH | mSOL |
| Chains | Ethereum | Solana |
| Node operators | Not disclosed | Automated delegation across hundreds of Solana validators via Stake Auction Marketplace |
| Audited | Yes | Yes |
| Restaking | Yes | No |
| Typical reward rate | Not disclosed | 5.04% - 7.6% |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2023 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | — | United States |
| Investors | Bullish, CoinFund, Chapter One, Node Capital +25 | Not disclosed |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Ethereum holders seeking layered restaking yield, DeFi users requiring liquid weETH collateral, Stakers wanting card spending options | Solana DeFi liquidity providers, Users avoiding smart contract risk, Institutions using qualified custodians |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

