EMCD vs Luxor
How EMCD vs Luxor compare on our ratings, mining company specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 3.7/5 | 4.2/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Track record | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Costs & fees | 2.5 | 3.5 |
| Transparency | 3.5 | 4.5 |
| Scale & reliability | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Support | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Specs | ||
| Type | Mining pool, Firmware & software | Mining pool, Firmware & software |
| Coins | BTC, LTC, DOGE, BCH, ETC, KAS, DASH, ZEC | Not disclosed |
| Pool fee | 1.5% to 4% | 2.5% (custom down to 0.7%, 0% with LuxOS) |
| Payout schemes | FPPS, PPS+, PPLNS | FPPS, Fixed, Upfront |
| Hashrate | 32 EH/s | >40 EH/s |
| Locations | Not disclosed | United States |
| Hardware models | Antminer | Antminer S19, Antminer S19 Pro, Antminer Z15 Pro, Whatsminer M50S, Whatsminer M60 |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2017 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | — | United States |
| Investors | Not disclosed | CMT Digital, Black Creek Digital, Hivemind Capital |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | ASIC operators seeking daily FPPS payouts, Scrypt miners targeting merged LTC and DOGE, Farms needing integrated fleet monitoring tools | Commercial ASIC mining operations, Miners seeking hashprice hedging tools, Data centers managing ERCOT power costs |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

