EMCD vs Luxor

How EMCD vs Luxor compare on our ratings, mining company specs, funding, pros and cons.

EMCD3.7/5
VS
Luxor4.2/5
Feature
Ratings
Our score3.7/54.2/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Track record4.54.5
Costs & fees2.53.5
Transparency3.54.5
Scale & reliability4.04.5
Support4.04.0
Specs
TypeMining pool, Firmware & softwareMining pool, Firmware & software
CoinsBTC, LTC, DOGE, BCH, ETC, KAS, DASH, ZECNot disclosed
Pool fee1.5% to 4%2.5% (custom down to 0.7%, 0% with LuxOS)
Payout schemesFPPS, PPS+, PPLNSFPPS, Fixed, Upfront
Hashrate32 EH/s>40 EH/s
LocationsNot disclosedUnited States
Hardware modelsAntminerAntminer S19, Antminer S19 Pro, Antminer Z15 Pro, Whatsminer M50S, Whatsminer M60
Company
Founded20172017
Headquarters—United States
InvestorsNot disclosedCMT Digital, Black Creek Digital, Hivemind Capital
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Controls over 2% of total Bitcoin network hashrate
  • Continuous operations and tracked pool performance since 2017
  • Merged mining enabled for simultaneous LTC and DOGE yields
  • Supports multiple reward distribution models including FPPS and PPLNS
  • SOC 1 and SOC 2 compliance verifies security and financial accounting controls
  • Pool fees can be reduced to 0% when paired with LuxOS firmware
  • Upfront payout schemes offer non-dilutive liquidity against future hashrate production
  • Over 40 EH/s in hashrate provides consistent block discovery and payout regularity
Cons
  • Bitcoin mining pool fee is 4% on standard tiers
  • Merged mining payouts require meeting withdrawal thresholds on both assets simultaneously
  • Platform wallet and Coinhold products require custodial trust
  • Mining accounts are subject to mandatory AML and CTF verification checks
  • Standard unbundled FPPS pool fee of 2.5% is above market discount averages
  • Grid management and retail power services are restricted to ERCOT and SPP regions
  • Derivatives and fixed contracts involve counterparty credit exposure
  • Upfront payout agreements require strict minimum uptime and delivery commitments
Best forASIC operators seeking daily FPPS payouts, Scrypt miners targeting merged LTC and DOGE, Farms needing integrated fleet monitoring toolsCommercial ASIC mining operations, Miners seeking hashprice hedging tools, Data centers managing ERCOT power costs

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.