EMCD vs Foundry
How EMCD vs Foundry compare on our ratings, mining company specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 3.7/5 | 4.3/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Track record | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Costs & fees | 2.5 | 4.5 |
| Transparency | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Scale & reliability | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Support | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Specs | ||
| Type | Mining pool, Firmware & software | Mining pool, Firmware & software |
| Coins | BTC, LTC, DOGE, BCH, ETC, KAS, DASH, ZEC | BTC, ZEC |
| Pool fee | 1.5% to 4% | 0% |
| Payout schemes | FPPS, PPS+, PPLNS | FPPS |
| Minimum payout | Not disclosed | 0.001 BTC |
| Hashrate | 32 EH/s | Not disclosed |
| Locations | Not disclosed | United States |
| Hardware models | Antminer | Not disclosed |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2017 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | — | United States |
| Investors | Not disclosed | Digital Currency Group |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | ASIC operators seeking daily FPPS payouts, Scrypt miners targeting merged LTC and DOGE, Farms needing integrated fleet monitoring tools | North American institutional Bitcoin miners, Commercial hosting facility operators, Enterprise entities seeking FPPS payouts |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

