CoW Swap vs Uniswap
How CoW Swap vs Uniswap compare on our ratings, dex specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 3.6/5 | 4.1/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Liquidity & pricing | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Fees | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Security | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Ease of use | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Chain coverage | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Specs | ||
| KYC required | No | No |
| Type | Aggregator | AMM |
| Chains | Ethereum | Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, BNB Chain, Other |
| Swap fee | 50% of surplus plus 2 basis points of volume, with partner fees and MEV Blocker fees | Not disclosed |
| Limit orders | Yes | Yes |
| Cross-chain swaps | No | Yes |
| Audited | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Governance token | COW | UNI |
| Perpetual futures | No | No |
| Routes across other DEXs | Yes | Yes |
| MEV protection | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile app | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2021 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | — | United States |
| Investors | Greenfield Capital, Private and CoWmunity investors, 1kx | Polychain Capital, BlackRock, Andreessen Horowitz, Paradigm +8 |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Large spot swaps, MEV-sensitive traders, DAO treasury execution | On-chain token traders, Concentrated liquidity providers, Developers building EVM swaps |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.