Confirmo vs Flexa

How Confirmo vs Flexa compare on our ratings, payment gateway specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Flexa4.1/5
Feature
Ratings
Our score3.9/54.1/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Fees3.54.5
Integrations4.04.0
Settlement options4.04.5
Reliability4.54.5
Support3.53.0
Specs
Processing fee0.5%Not disclosed
SettlementCrypto, Stablecoins, Fiat, Auto-conversionCrypto, Stablecoins, Fiat, Auto-conversion
Coins supportedNot disclosed99
IntegrationsWooCommerce, API, WebhooksBase Pay, iOS SDK, Android SDK, React Native SDK
Invoicing YesNot disclosed
Recurring payments YesNot disclosed
Mass payouts Yes Yes
Point of sale Yes Yes
Self-hosted option No No
Business verification (KYB) Yes Yes
Settle in stablecoins Yes Yes
Merchant countriesEuropean Union, United StatesUnited States, Canada, El Salvador
API & SDKs Yes Yes
Company
Founded20142018
HeadquartersCzech RepublicUnited States
InvestorsNot disclosedPantera Capital, 1kx, Access Ventures, Nima Capital
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Holds both MiCA authorization and a Central Bank of Ireland Payment Institution license
  • Processing fees between 0.5% and 0.8% with zero monthly software costs
  • Smart contracts for recurring stablecoin billing audited by Halborn
  • Operates across all 50 U.S. states and 141 countries
  • Supports 99+ digital assets
  • Lists 0% conversion and custody fees on payouts
  • Offers online, in-app and point-of-sale acceptance
  • Supports self-custody wallets through mobile SDKs
Cons
  • Fiat bank settlements are restricted to businesses with European bank accounts
  • No dedicated sandbox environment, requiring live-chain testing with real funds
  • Merchant funds face custodial counterparty exposure prior to wallet payout
  • Standard transaction fee of 0.8% is higher than unverified peer-to-peer gateways
  • Merchant coverage varies by country and regulatory requirements
  • AMP collateral adds technical and token-system dependency
  • Crypto payment mistakes are generally irreversible
  • Specific asset and network availability depends on integration
Best forEuropean merchants needing fiat payouts, SaaS platforms billing recurring stablecoins, Trading firms executing bulk disbursementsMultichannel crypto acceptance, Self-custody wallet integrations, SEPA-region merchants

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons