Compound vs Morpho

How Compound vs Morpho compare on our ratings, lending protocol specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Morpho4.5/5
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.0/54.5/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security & track record4.54.5
Rates4.04.5
Market depth3.55.0
Ease of use4.04.0
Decentralization4.04.5
Specs
KYC required No No
Lending modelIsolated marketsIsolated markets
ChainsEthereum, Arbitrum, BaseEthereum, Base, Hyperliquid, Other
Main collateral assetsETH, WBTC, USDC, USDTcbBTC, USDC, ETH, PAXG
Flash loans No Yes
Permissionless markets No Yes
Audited Yes Yes
Bug bounty Yes Yes
Governance tokenCOMPMORPHO
Isolated markets Yes Yes
Real-world-asset collateral NoNot disclosed
Own stablecoin No No
RatesVariableVariable and fixed
Company
Founded20172021
Headquarters—France
InvestorsDragonfly, Polychain Capital, a16z cryptoParadigm, Ribbit Capital, a16z crypto, Hack VC +4
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Audited by OpenZeppelin and ChainSecurity with a $1M bug bounty
  • Processed $480B in all-time deposits and borrows since 2018
  • No KYC required to supply or borrow on standard markets
  • Active on Ethereum, Base, and Arbitrum
  • Isolated markets prevent bad debt in one asset from impacting other protocol pools
  • Over 30 independent smart contract audits and formal verification by Certora
  • Supported by $175M in institutional backing from Paradigm, a16z crypto, and Ribbit
  • Vault fee changes require an onchain timelock before curators can enforce them
Cons
  • Lacks an umbrella safety module to cover protocol-wide bad debt
  • Borrow rates vary with base-asset pool utilization
  • Does not support permissionless market creation by users
  • Borrowing is restricted to only one designated base asset per pool
  • Vault depositors take on discretionary risk from third-party curator allocations
  • Isolated pools fragment liquidity across individual debt and collateral pairs
  • April 2025 frontend bundler update caused an approval bug that exposed user funds
Best forUSDC and WETH borrowers, Suppliers avoiding rehypothecation risk, Users seeking yield on supported EVM networksDeFi lenders seeking risk-isolated markets, Borrowers requiring fixed-rate crypto terms, Passive yield depositors using curated vaults

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons