Compound vs Moonwell
How Compound vs Moonwell compare on our ratings, lending protocol specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 4.0/5 | 3.0/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Security & track record | 4.5 | 1.5 |
| Rates | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Market depth | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Ease of use | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Decentralization | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Specs | ||
| KYC required | No | No |
| Lending model | Isolated markets | Pooled |
| Chains | Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base | Base, Optimism, Ethereum |
| Main collateral assets | ETH, WBTC, USDC, USDT | ETH, USDC, USDT, cbBTC |
| Flash loans | No | Not disclosed |
| Permissionless markets | No | Not disclosed |
| Audited | Yes | Yes |
| Bug bounty | Yes | Yes |
| Governance token | COMP | WELL |
| Isolated markets | Yes | Yes |
| Real-world-asset collateral | No | Not disclosed |
| Own stablecoin | No | No |
| Rates | Variable | Variable |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2017 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | — | Finland |
| Investors | Dragonfly, Polychain Capital, a16z crypto | Arrington Capital, Hypersphere, C Squared, Charterhouse Strategic Partners +10 |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | USDC and WETH borrowers, Suppliers avoiding rehypothecation risk, Users seeking yield on supported EVM networks | DeFi lenders on Base and Optimism, Borrowers supplying ETH or stablecoin collateral, Yield aggregators integrating Morpho vaults |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

