Compound vs Maple Finance

How Compound vs Maple Finance compare on our ratings, lending protocol specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.0/54.0/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security & track record4.54.5
Rates4.04.0
Market depth3.54.5
Ease of use4.03.5
Decentralization4.03.0
Specs
KYC required No Yes
Lending modelIsolated marketsPooled
ChainsEthereum, Arbitrum, BaseEthereum
Main collateral assetsETH, WBTC, USDC, USDTUSDC, USDT, BTC
Flash loans NoNot disclosed
Permissionless markets No No
Audited Yes Yes
Bug bounty YesNot disclosed
Governance tokenCOMPSYRUP
Isolated markets Yes Yes
Real-world-asset collateral No Yes
Own stablecoin No No
RatesVariableNot disclosed
Company
Founded20172019
Headquarters——
InvestorsDragonfly, Polychain Capital, a16z cryptoBlockTower Capital, Tioga Capital, Framework Ventures, Polychain Capital +13
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Audited by OpenZeppelin and ChainSecurity with a $1M bug bounty
  • Processed $480B in all-time deposits and borrows since 2018
  • No KYC required to supply or borrow on standard markets
  • Active on Ethereum, Base, and Arbitrum
  • Over $4.6B in assets under management backed by overcollateralized loans
  • Maple monitors smart contract invariants every block
  • Processed over $800M in redemptions within 72 hours during the rsETH exploit
  • Regular SYRUP token buybacks funded directly by protocol cash flow
Cons
  • Lacks an umbrella safety module to cover protocol-wide bad debt
  • Borrow rates vary with base-asset pool utilization
  • Does not support permissionless market creation by users
  • Borrowing is restricted to only one designated base asset per pool
  • Liquid yield products exclude US residents and entities
  • Borrowing requires offchain compliance and institutional underwriting approval
  • Returns depend on institutional counterparty solvency rather than instant liquidations
Best forUSDC and WETH borrowers, Suppliers avoiding rehypothecation risk, Users seeking yield on supported EVM networksNon-US stablecoin yield seekers, Institutions seeking secured onchain credit, DeFi treasuries allocating to real yields

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons