CleanSpark vs OCEAN
How CleanSpark vs OCEAN compare on our ratings, mining company specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 4.2/5 | 3.9/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Track record | 4.5 | 3.5 |
| Costs & fees | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Transparency | 4.5 | 5.0 |
| Scale & reliability | 5.0 | 3.5 |
| Support | 3.0 | 3.5 |
| Specs | ||
| Type | Public miner | Mining pool |
| Coins | BTC | BTC |
| Pool fee | Not disclosed | 1% (DATUM) to 2% |
| Payout schemes | Not disclosed | TIDES |
| Minimum payout | Not disclosed | 0.01048576 BTC (on-chain) |
| Hashrate | 50 EH/s | 22.15 EH/s |
| Stock ticker | CLSK | Not disclosed |
| Locations | Georgia, Mississippi, Tennessee, Wyoming | Not disclosed |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2014 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | United States | — |
| Investors | Not disclosed | Jack Dorsey |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Public equity investors seeking Bitcoin mining exposure, Institutional research on industrial Bitcoin data centers, Enterprise clients seeking HPC data center infrastructure | Miners seeking non-custodial payouts, Operators running independent Bitcoin nodes, Small miners using Lightning payouts |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

