CryptoReview
Submit listing

Citowise vs ShapeShift

How Citowise vs ShapeShift compare on our ratings, wallet specs, funding, pros and cons.

Citowise3.0/5
VS
ShapeShift4.2/5
Feature
CitowiseVisit
ShapeShiftVisit
Ratings
Our score3.0/54.2/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security2.54.0
Ease of use3.04.0
Chain support3.54.5
Features3.04.0
Privacy3.54.5
Specs
KYC required No No
Wallet typeMobileMobile, Web
CustodySelf-custodialSelf-custodial
ChainsEthereum, Bitcoin, OtherEthereum, Bitcoin, Solana, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, Avalanche, Tron, Cosmos, Other
PlatformsiOS, AndroidiOS, Android
Open sourceNot disclosed Yes
Hardware wallet support Yes Yes
In-app swaps Yes Yes
StakingNot disclosed Yes
Buy crypto in app Yes Yes
WalletConnectNot disclosed Yes
Security featuresPIN protection, Encrypted local storage, Hardware wallet integrationNot disclosed
Recovery without a seed phrase NoNot disclosed
Passkey login NoNot disclosed
Swap feeNot disclosed0%
Perpetuals trading NoNot disclosed
Company
Founded20162014
HeadquartersEstoniaSwitzerland
InvestorsNot disclosedEarlybird Venture Capital, Access Venture Partners, Blockchain Capital, Lakestar +3
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Non-custodial key storage on user devices without mandatory registration
  • Direct integration with Trezor and Ledger Nano S hardware wallets
  • Support for Bitcoin, Ethereum, Bitcoin Cash, and ERC-20 tokens
  • Zero platform commission fees charged on decentralized trades
  • No identity verification or KYC required to swap or store funds
  • Covers more than 10,000 assets across 48 native blockchains
  • Direct hardware wallet connectivity for Ledger and Tangem devices
Cons
  • Project has shut down and mobile apps are no longer maintained
  • Past removal from the Google Play Store required manual APK installation
  • No modern security features like MPC recovery or passkey authentication
  • Third-party routing protocols and automated market makers impose variable swap fees and spreads
  • Cross-chain execution risks depend entirely on third-party bridge and DEX contract security
  • Users bear total responsibility for managing unassisted seed-phrase recovery
  • Trustpilot average rating stood at 3.0 out of 5 in March 2026
Best forHistorical wallet research, Cold storage mobile pairing, Early ERC-20 token trackingKYC-free cross-chain asset swaps, Multichain DeFi asset management, Hardware wallet integration users

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.