Circle vs Tether
How Circle vs Tether compare on our ratings, stablecoin specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 4.7/5 | 4.0/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Reserves & transparency | 5.0 | 4.5 |
| Peg stability | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| Regulation | 5.0 | 2.5 |
| Liquidity & chains | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Redemption | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Specs | ||
| Tickers | USDC, EURC | USDT, EURT, XAUT |
| Pegged to | US dollar | US dollar |
| Backing | Cash & treasuries | Cash & treasuries |
| Yield-bearing | No | No |
| Regulated issuer | Yes | No |
| Licenses & charters | US BitLicense (NYDFS), US FinCEN MSB, France EMI (ACPR / MiCA), UK EMI (FCA), Singapore MPI (MAS), ADGM FSRA FSP, Bermuda Class F | Not disclosed |
| Supply / market cap | $72.9B as of October 2026 | >$90 billion on Tron alone |
| Chains | Ethereum, Solana, Avalanche, Base, Stellar | Tron, Ethereum, Solana, Avalanche, Polygon, Celo, Near, Tezos, Algorand, EOS, Liquid Network, Omni |
| Reserve reports | Monthly reserve attestations by Deloitte & Touche, with daily CUSIP-level reporting of the Circle Reserve Fund via BlackRock. | Quarterly BDO Italia attestations and KPMG US financial audit |
| Redemption terms | 1:1 par redemption with 0% fees via Circle Mint for verified institutional accounts; retail redemptions via secondary exchanges. | Not disclosed |
| Issuer can freeze tokens | Yes | Yes |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2013 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | United States | El Salvador |
| Investors | Not disclosed | Cantor Fitzgerald |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Institutional cross-border payment settlement, DeFi liquidity providers and traders, European entities needing MiCA compliance | High-frequency crypto exchange traders, Cross-border transfer recipients outside the EU, Tron network settlement users |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

