Chainstack vs Securitize

Chainstack4.3/5

VS

Securitize3.6/5

Feature	ChainstackVisit	SecuritizeVisit
Ratings
Our score	4.3/5	3.6/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Reliability	4.5	4.5
Chain coverage	4.5	3.0
Pricing	4.0	3.0
Developer experience	4.5	3.0
Support	4.0	4.0
Specs
Services	RPC / nodes, Indexing	Not disclosed
Chains supported	70	1
Free tier	Yes	Not disclosed
Pricing from	$49/month	Not disclosed
Enterprise SLA	Yes	Not disclosed
Uptime SLA	99.99%	Not disclosed
Free tier limits	3M request units/month, up to 25 RPS	Not disclosed
Server regions	10+ global data centers	Not disclosed
Company
Founded	2018	2017
Headquarters	Singapore	United States
Investors	Not disclosed	Blockchain Capital, Morgan Stanley
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	70+ supported chains, including Ethereum, Solana, Bitcoin and X Layer Free tier includes 3 million monthly request units Global Nodes route requests across 10+ data centers Self-Hosted keeps node deployment on customer-owned infrastructure	Operates an SEC-regulated broker-dealer and registered Alternative Trading System Publicly listed on the New York Stock Exchange under SECZ Manages tokenization for roughly 3,000 clients Supported by Morgan Stanley and Blockchain Capital
Cons	Paid plans begin at $49 per month after the free tier Managed endpoints create dependence on Chainstack routing and node operations Dedicated Nodes start at $678 per month Global routing can add infrastructure and provider concentration risk	Strict identity checks exclude retail users in unsupported jurisdictions Public chain deployments remain exposed to Solana network congestion risks
Best for	Multichain application teams, RPC-heavy trading systems, Enterprise blockchain infrastructure	Institutions issuing tokenized private funds, Asset managers building onchain equities, Accredited investors seeking secondary private assets

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons