Chainstack vs RTrade Technologies

Chainstack4.3/5

VS

RTrade Technologies1.5/5

Feature	ChainstackVisit	RTrade TechnologiesVisit
Ratings
Our score	4.3/5	1.5/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Reliability	4.5	1.0
Chain coverage	4.5	1.5
Pricing	4.0	1.0
Developer experience	4.5	3.0
Support	4.0	1.0
Specs
Services	RPC / nodes, Indexing	Oracle, Developer tooling
Chains supported	70	Not disclosed
Free tier	Yes	Not disclosed
Pricing from	$49/month	Not disclosed
Enterprise SLA	Yes	Not disclosed
Open source	Not disclosed	Yes
Token	Not disclosed	RTC
Uptime SLA	99.99%	Not disclosed
Free tier limits	3M request units/month, up to 25 RPS	Not disclosed
Server regions	10+ global data centers	Not disclosed
Company
Founded	2018	—
Headquarters	Singapore	—
Investors	Not disclosed	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	70+ supported chains, including Ethereum, Solana, Bitcoin and X Layer Free tier includes 3 million monthly request units Global Nodes route requests across 10+ data centers Self-Hosted keeps node deployment on customer-owned infrastructure	252 public GitHub repositories are associated with RTrade Technologies IPFS storage is linked to Solidity smart-contract references Chainlink partnership announced in October 2018 Work covers both storage and oracle infrastructure
Cons	Paid plans begin at $49 per month after the free tier Managed endpoints create dependence on Chainstack routing and node operations Dedicated Nodes start at $678 per month Global routing can add infrastructure and provider concentration risk	The official website currently hosts no active product content RTC creates token-related exposure around the infrastructure project
Best for	Multichain application teams, RPC-heavy trading systems, Enterprise blockchain infrastructure	IPFS infrastructure research, Smart-contract storage projects, Historical oracle research

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons