Chainlink CCIP vs Squid

Chainlink CCIP4.1/5

VS

Squid4.4/5

Feature	Chainlink CCIPVisit	SquidVisit
Ratings
Our score	4.1/5	4.4/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Security	5.0	4.0
Speed	3.5	4.5
Fees	3.5	4.5
Chain coverage	4.5	5.0
Ease of use	3.0	4.5
Specs
Design	Messaging protocol	Aggregator
Chains	Ethereum, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, Polygon, Avalanche, Solana, Hyperliquid, Other	Ethereum, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, Polygon, Avalanche, Cosmos, Other
Chains supported	80	100
Typical fee	Not disclosed	0% on stablecoin swaps; variable route and gas fees
Typical transfer time	Not disclosed	5s
Security model	Chainlink oracle networks plus a separate Risk Management Network	Depends on the underlying route
Audited	Yes	Yes
Token	LINK	QUID
Intent-based	Not disclosed	Yes
Native token transfers (no wrapped tokens)	Yes	Yes
Company
Founded	2023	2022
Headquarters	United States	Virgin Islands, British
Investors	Not disclosed	North Island Ventures, Polychain Capital
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Secures over $85 billion in cross-chain value across 80+ networks Completed a SOC 2 Type 2 examination by Deloitte & Touche LLP Requires consensus across 16 independent oracle operators by default Programmable transfers execute contract instructions and move assets in one call	Routes across 100+ chains including non-EVM networks like Solana, XRPL, and Cosmos Zero protocol fees charged on stablecoin swaps Executes swaps in native tokens without issuing wrapped assets Completed 9 security audits with no historical protocol exploits
Cons	Full finality requirements result in slower settlement than intent-based bridges Security depends on the collective liveness and integrity of oracle node operators Token pool risk remains with custom issuer smart contract implementations	Variable routing fees apply to non-stablecoin token swaps Security depends on multiple third-party bridges and solver networks Potential for slippage or execution delays during extreme liquidity shortfalls
Best for	Cross-chain DeFi asset issuers, Institutions requiring automated compliance, Developers deploying multichain smart contracts	Non-EVM to EVM token traders, DeFi users moving stablecoins fee-free, Developers embedding cross-chain swap widgets

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons