Ceffu vs Fireblocks
How Ceffu vs Fireblocks compare on our ratings, custodian specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 3.4/5 | 4.3/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Security | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Compliance | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Asset support | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| Features | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Support | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Specs | ||
| KYC required | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Custody model | Qualified custodian, MPC | Qualified custodian, MPC, HSM, Self-custody software |
| Clients | Institutions, Funds, Corporates | Institutions, Funds, Corporates |
| Regulated | Yes | Yes |
| SOC 2 report | Yes | Yes |
| Staking | Yes | Yes |
| API access | Yes | Yes |
| Licenses & charters | VARA VASP license for custody services (Dubai, UAE), GFSO financial services license (Gelephu, Bhutan) | NYDFS limited purpose trust charter (US), FinCEN MSB registration (US), State money transmitter licenses in 37 states and DC (US) |
| MPC | Yes | Yes |
| Cold storage | Yes | Yes |
| Qualified custodian | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2021 | — |
| Headquarters | — | United States |
| Investors | Not disclosed | D1 Capital Partners, Spark Capital |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Trading firms that execute on Binance and want assets held off the exchange, Crypto ETP issuers on SIX Swiss Exchange that need an approved custodian, Institutional and qualified investors in or from Dubai | Exchanges and payment companies building in-house custody, Funds and RIAs that need a New York qualified custodian, Fintechs launching embedded or white-label wallets |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

