Bitpie vs ShapeShift
How Bitpie vs ShapeShift compare on our ratings, wallet specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 3.7/5 | 4.2/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Security | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Ease of use | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Chain support | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Features | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Privacy | 3.5 | 4.5 |
| Specs | ||
| KYC required | No | No |
| Wallet type | Mobile | Mobile, Web |
| Custody | Self-custodial | Self-custodial |
| Chains | Ethereum, Bitcoin, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Optimism, Tron, Other | Ethereum, Bitcoin, Solana, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, Avalanche, Tron, Cosmos, Other |
| Platforms | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
| Open source | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Hardware wallet support | Yes | Yes |
| In-app swaps | Yes | Yes |
| Staking | Yes | Yes |
| Buy crypto in app | No | Yes |
| WalletConnect | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Security features | HD wallet structure, BITHD hardware pairing, 12-word seed phrase backup, Batch transfer security | Not disclosed |
| Recovery without a seed phrase | No | Not disclosed |
| Passkey login | No | Not disclosed |
| Multisig | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Built-in dApp browser | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Swap fee | Not disclosed | 0% |
| Perpetuals trading | No | Not disclosed |
| Company | ||
| Founded | — | 2014 |
| Headquarters | — | Switzerland |
| Investors | China Merchants Bank | Earlybird Venture Capital, Access Venture Partners, Blockchain Capital, Lakestar +3 |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | High-volume batch token senders, TRON and USDT active transferrers, BITHD hardware wallet owners | KYC-free cross-chain asset swaps, Multichain DeFi asset management, Hardware wallet integration users |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

