BitGo vs Zodia Custody

How BitGo vs Zodia Custody compare on our ratings, custodian specs, funding, pros and cons.

BitGo4.5/5
VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.5/53.8/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.54.0
Compliance4.54.0
Asset support4.53.0
Features4.54.0
Support4.54.0
Specs
KYC required YesNot disclosed
Custody modelQualified custodian, Multi-sig, MPC, HSM, Self-custody softwareQualified custodian, HSM
ClientsInstitutions, Funds, Corporates, High-net-worth, RetailInstitutions, Funds, Corporates
Regulated Yes Yes
SOC 2 report Yes Yes
InsuranceUp to $250M for assets where BitGo Bank & Trust holds all keys (Lloyd's of London and European market syndicate)$100M digital asset custody policy (no retention), plus $55M crime, $10M professional indemnity and $275M cyber cover
Assets supported1,770Not disclosed
Staking Yes Yes
API access Yes Yes
Licenses & chartersOCC national trust bank charter (US), NYDFS limited purpose trust charter (US), FinCEN MSB registration and state MTLs (US), SEC broker-dealer registration (US), BaFin MiCA CASP authorization (Germany), VQF SRO membership under FINMA oversight (Switzerland), VARA custody license (Dubai, UAE), VARA broker-dealer license (Dubai, UAE), MAS Major Payment Institution license (Singapore), FINTRAC foreign MSB registration (Canada)CSSF MiCA CASP authorization (Luxembourg), CSSF payment institution license (Luxembourg), FCA cryptoasset registration under MLRs (UK), ADGM FSRA Financial Services Permission (UAE), Companies Registry TCSP license (Hong Kong)
MPC YesNot disclosed
Cold storage Yes Yes
Qualified custodian YesNot disclosed
Company
Founded20132020
HeadquartersUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
InvestorsValor Equity Partners, Redpoint Ventures, Public, Galaxy Digital +1Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Up to $250M insurance from a Lloyd's and European market syndicate where BitGo holds all keys
  • Qualified custody fully backed by cold storage, with over 95% of client assets held cold at the end of 2025
  • Licensed by the OCC, NYDFS, BaFin under MiCA, Dubai's VARA and Singapore's MAS
  • Over 1,770 supported assets as of December 31, 2025
  • Shareholders include Standard Chartered, Northern Trust, SBI Holdings, NAB and Emirates NBD
  • CSSF MiCA authorization since December 2025, plus a payment institution license for e-money tokens
  • Published insurance limits, including a $100M custody policy with no retention and $275M cyber cover
  • Interchange settlement with Deribit and LMAX Digital while assets stay in cold storage
Cons
  • Material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting disclosed in its FY2025 10-K
  • Securities class action filed in June 2026, and the Galaxy Digital suit was awaiting a ruling as of August 2026
  • COO left in October 2026 and the CFO is transitioning out
  • Insurance excludes hot wallets and setups where clients hold keys
  • Standard Chartered takeover still needs regulatory approval, and the software arm is splitting off
  • UK entity holds only an FCA anti-money laundering registration, with no FOS or FSCS protection
  • Listed SOC 2 report is Type I, not Type II
  • Only 78 listed tokens and no public fee schedule
Best forFunds and ETF issuers needing a long asset list and published insurance, Global firms that want licensed entities in the US, EU, Dubai and Singapore, Exchanges and fintechs building wallets on an APIAsset managers and ETP issuers that need MiCA-authorized custody in the EU, Trading firms settling off-exchange with venues on Interchange, Banks and wealth managers that want a bank-backed custodian

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons