BitGo vs Utila

How BitGo vs Utila compare on our ratings, custodian specs, funding, pros and cons.

BitGo4.5/5
VS
Utila3.7/5
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.5/53.7/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.54.0
Compliance4.52.5
Asset support4.54.0
Features4.54.5
Support4.54.0
Specs
KYC required YesNot disclosed
Custody modelQualified custodian, Multi-sig, MPC, HSM, Self-custody softwareMPC, Self-custody software
ClientsInstitutions, Funds, Corporates, High-net-worth, RetailInstitutions, Funds, Corporates
Regulated YesNot disclosed
SOC 2 report YesNot disclosed
InsuranceUp to $250M for assets where BitGo Bank & Trust holds all keys (Lloyd's of London and European market syndicate)Not disclosed
Assets supported1,770Not disclosed
Staking Yes Yes
API access Yes Yes
Licenses & chartersOCC national trust bank charter (US), NYDFS limited purpose trust charter (US), FinCEN MSB registration and state MTLs (US), SEC broker-dealer registration (US), BaFin MiCA CASP authorization (Germany), VQF SRO membership under FINMA oversight (Switzerland), VARA custody license (Dubai, UAE), VARA broker-dealer license (Dubai, UAE), MAS Major Payment Institution license (Singapore), FINTRAC foreign MSB registration (Canada)Not disclosed
MPC Yes Yes
Cold storage YesNot disclosed
Qualified custodian Yes No
Company
Founded20132022
HeadquartersUnited States—
InvestorsValor Equity Partners, Redpoint Ventures, Public, Galaxy Digital +1Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Up to $250M insurance from a Lloyd's and European market syndicate where BitGo holds all keys
  • Qualified custody fully backed by cold storage, with over 95% of client assets held cold at the end of 2025
  • Licensed by the OCC, NYDFS, BaFin under MiCA, Dubai's VARA and Singapore's MAS
  • Over 1,770 supported assets as of December 31, 2025
  • Published Starter plan at $799 per month with all chains included
  • Two-party MPC with offline recovery controlled by the client's administrator
  • 41 mainnets plus custom EVM networks
  • Utila Link counterparty network and licensed partners for MiCA and US coverage
Cons
  • Material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting disclosed in its FY2025 10-K
  • Securities class action filed in June 2026, and the Galaxy Digital suit was awaiting a ruling as of August 2026
  • COO left in October 2026 and the CFO is transitioning out
  • Insurance excludes hot wallets and setups where clients hold keys
  • No license or charter of its own
  • Utila's key share takes part in every signature
  • SOC 2 Type II and audit claims are self-published
  • Short operating history since its 2022 founding
Best forFunds and ETF issuers needing a long asset list and published insurance, Global firms that want licensed entities in the US, EU, Dubai and Singapore, Exchanges and fintechs building wallets on an APIFintechs and PSPs running stablecoin payments, Trading firms that need automated MPC signing through an API, Stablecoin and token issuers managing treasury wallets

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons