BitGo vs Sygnum Bank

How BitGo vs Sygnum Bank compare on our ratings, custodian specs, funding, pros and cons.

BitGo4.5/5
VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.5/53.8/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.53.5
Compliance4.54.5
Asset support4.53.0
Features4.54.0
Support4.54.0
Specs
KYC required YesNot disclosed
Custody modelQualified custodian, Multi-sig, MPC, HSM, Self-custody softwareQualified custodian
ClientsInstitutions, Funds, Corporates, High-net-worth, RetailInstitutions, Funds, High-net-worth
Regulated Yes Yes
SOC 2 report YesNot disclosed
InsuranceUp to $250M for assets where BitGo Bank & Trust holds all keys (Lloyd's of London and European market syndicate)Not disclosed
Assets supported1,770Not disclosed
Staking YesNot disclosed
API access YesNot disclosed
Licenses & chartersOCC national trust bank charter (US), NYDFS limited purpose trust charter (US), FinCEN MSB registration and state MTLs (US), SEC broker-dealer registration (US), BaFin MiCA CASP authorization (Germany), VQF SRO membership under FINMA oversight (Switzerland), VARA custody license (Dubai, UAE), VARA broker-dealer license (Dubai, UAE), MAS Major Payment Institution license (Singapore), FINTRAC foreign MSB registration (Canada)FINMA banking and securities dealer license (Switzerland), MAS Capital Markets Services license (Singapore), MAS Major Payment Institution license (Singapore), ADGM FSRA Financial Services Permission (UAE), MiCA CASP authorization (Liechtenstein)
MPC YesNot disclosed
Cold storage YesNot disclosed
Qualified custodian Yes Yes
Company
Founded20132018
HeadquartersUnited StatesSwitzerland
InvestorsValor Equity Partners, Redpoint Ventures, Public, Galaxy Digital +1Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Up to $250M insurance from a Lloyd's and European market syndicate where BitGo holds all keys
  • Qualified custody fully backed by cold storage, with over 95% of client assets held cold at the end of 2025
  • Licensed by the OCC, NYDFS, BaFin under MiCA, Dubai's VARA and Singapore's MAS
  • Over 1,770 supported assets as of December 31, 2025
  • FINMA bank license since 2019, plus MAS, ADGM and MiCA authorizations
  • Protect off-exchange custody passed $1 billion in assets in March 2026
  • MiCA passport to all 30 EEA states since June 2026
  • PwC ISAE 3402 Type 2 and ISAE 3000 assurance on the custody platform
Cons
  • Material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting disclosed in its FY2025 10-K
  • Securities class action filed in June 2026, and the Galaxy Digital suit was awaiting a ruling as of August 2026
  • COO left in October 2026 and the CFO is transitioning out
  • Insurance excludes hot wallets and setups where clients hold keys
  • Custody is bank-held, so clients depend on Sygnum's key management
  • EU MiCA authorization arrived in June 2026, after a Q1 2025 target
  • Board and executive changes at the 2026 annual meeting
Best forFunds and ETF issuers needing a long asset list and published insurance, Global firms that want licensed entities in the US, EU, Dubai and Singapore, Exchanges and fintechs building wallets on an APIHedge funds and trading firms that want exchange collateral held at a bank, High-net-worth clients and family offices seeking bank custody for crypto, Banks adding digital asset services through a partner bank

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons