BitGo vs Prometheum Capital

How BitGo vs Prometheum Capital compare on our ratings, custodian specs, funding, pros and cons.

BitGo4.5/5
VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.5/52.8/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.52.5
Compliance4.53.5
Asset support4.51.5
Features4.53.5
Support4.53.0
Specs
KYC required Yes Yes
Custody modelQualified custodian, Multi-sig, MPC, HSM, Self-custody softwareQualified custodian
ClientsInstitutions, Funds, Corporates, High-net-worth, RetailNot disclosed
Regulated Yes Yes
SOC 2 report YesNot disclosed
InsuranceUp to $250M for assets where BitGo Bank & Trust holds all keys (Lloyd's of London and European market syndicate)Not disclosed
Assets supported1,770Not disclosed
Staking YesNot disclosed
API access YesNot disclosed
Licenses & chartersOCC national trust bank charter (US), NYDFS limited purpose trust charter (US), FinCEN MSB registration and state MTLs (US), SEC broker-dealer registration (US), BaFin MiCA CASP authorization (Germany), VQF SRO membership under FINMA oversight (Switzerland), VARA custody license (Dubai, UAE), VARA broker-dealer license (Dubai, UAE), MAS Major Payment Institution license (Singapore), FINTRAC foreign MSB registration (Canada)SEC/FINRA special purpose broker-dealer (US), SEC/FINRA broker-dealer operating an ATS (US), SEC/FINRA issuance broker-dealer (US), SEC transfer agent registration (US)
MPC YesNot disclosed
Cold storage YesNot disclosed
Qualified custodian Yes Yes
Company
Founded20132017
HeadquartersUnited StatesUnited States
InvestorsValor Equity Partners, Redpoint Ventures, Public, Galaxy Digital +1Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Up to $250M insurance from a Lloyd's and European market syndicate where BitGo holds all keys
  • Qualified custody fully backed by cold storage, with over 95% of client assets held cold at the end of 2025
  • Licensed by the OCC, NYDFS, BaFin under MiCA, Dubai's VARA and Singapore's MAS
  • Over 1,770 supported assets as of December 31, 2025
  • Crypto custody inside an SEC-registered, FINRA member broker-dealer under Rule 15c3-3
  • Correspondent clearing lets broker-dealers hold ETH in ordinary brokerage accounts
  • Group includes an issuance broker-dealer, an ATS and an SEC-registered transfer agent
  • No BrokerCheck disclosures for Prometheum Capital or Prometheum ATS
Cons
  • Material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting disclosed in its FY2025 10-K
  • Securities class action filed in June 2026, and the Galaxy Digital suit was awaiting a ruling as of August 2026
  • COO left in October 2026 and the CFO is transitioning out
  • Insurance excludes hot wallets and setups where clients hold keys
  • Narrow crypto coverage, with ETH the only token named in 2026 releases
  • Assets are not SIPC or FDIC insured, per company disclosures
  • Custody technology is described only in general terms
  • A 2023 congressional letter questioned past ties to Wanxiang and HashKey
Best forFunds and ETF issuers needing a long asset list and published insurance, Global firms that want licensed entities in the US, EU, Dubai and Singapore, Exchanges and fintechs building wallets on an APIUS introducing broker-dealers adding crypto to client brokerage accounts, Self-clearing broker-dealers that want omnibus crypto custody, Issuers planning tokenized funds or equities in the US

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons