BitGo vs Liminal Custody

How BitGo vs Liminal Custody compare on our ratings, custodian specs, funding, pros and cons.

BitGo4.5/5
VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.5/53.0/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.52.5
Compliance4.52.0
Asset support4.53.5
Features4.54.0
Support4.53.5
Specs
KYC required Yes Yes
Custody modelQualified custodian, Multi-sig, MPC, HSM, Self-custody softwareMPC, Multi-sig, HSM, Self-custody software
ClientsInstitutions, Funds, Corporates, High-net-worth, RetailInstitutions, Funds, Corporates, High-net-worth
Regulated YesNot disclosed
SOC 2 report Yes Yes
InsuranceUp to $250M for assets where BitGo Bank & Trust holds all keys (Lloyd's of London and European market syndicate)Not disclosed
Assets supported1,7701,200
Staking Yes Yes
API access Yes Yes
Licenses & chartersOCC national trust bank charter (US), NYDFS limited purpose trust charter (US), FinCEN MSB registration and state MTLs (US), SEC broker-dealer registration (US), BaFin MiCA CASP authorization (Germany), VQF SRO membership under FINMA oversight (Switzerland), VARA custody license (Dubai, UAE), VARA broker-dealer license (Dubai, UAE), MAS Major Payment Institution license (Singapore), FINTRAC foreign MSB registration (Canada)Not disclosed
MPC Yes Yes
Cold storage Yes Yes
Qualified custodian YesNot disclosed
Company
Founded20132021
HeadquartersUnited StatesSingapore
InvestorsValor Equity Partners, Redpoint Ventures, Public, Galaxy Digital +1Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Up to $250M insurance from a Lloyd's and European market syndicate where BitGo holds all keys
  • Qualified custody fully backed by cold storage, with over 95% of client assets held cold at the end of 2025
  • Licensed by the OCC, NYDFS, BaFin under MiCA, Dubai's VARA and Singapore's MAS
  • Over 1,770 supported assets as of December 31, 2025
  • 1,200+ supported tokens across 20 documented chains
  • MPC and multisig wallets plus a Securosys-based HSM vault on one platform
  • SOC 2 Type II report and ISO/IEC 27001 and 27701 certifications
  • Staking from cold wallets through Figment-powered validators
Cons
  • Material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting disclosed in its FY2025 10-K
  • Securities class action filed in June 2026, and the Galaxy Digital suit was awaiting a ruling as of August 2026
  • COO left in October 2026 and the CFO is transitioning out
  • Insurance excludes hot wallets and setups where clients hold keys
  • ADGM custody permission withdrawn in March 2025, and the Dubai entity is absent from VARA's license register
  • Singapore custody entity is exempt under the Payment Services Act, not fully licensed
  • Only insurance on record is a 2022 $50M key-loss policy shared among clients
  • About $235M was stolen from a WazirX multisig wallet on the platform in 2024, with the two firms disputing the cause
Best forFunds and ETF issuers needing a long asset list and published insurance, Global firms that want licensed entities in the US, EU, Dubai and Singapore, Exchanges and fintechs building wallets on an APICrypto exchanges running their own hot, warm and cold wallets, OTC desks and fintechs that need wallet-as-a-service with policy controls, Banks testing hybrid MPC and HSM cold custody

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons