BitGo vs Copper

How BitGo vs Copper compare on our ratings, custodian specs, funding, pros and cons.

BitGo4.5/5
VS
Copper3.5/5
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.5/53.5/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.54.0
Compliance4.52.5
Asset support4.54.0
Features4.54.5
Support4.53.0
Specs
KYC required YesNot disclosed
Custody modelQualified custodian, Multi-sig, MPC, HSM, Self-custody softwareNot disclosed
ClientsInstitutions, Funds, Corporates, High-net-worth, RetailInstitutions, Funds
Regulated Yes Yes
SOC 2 report Yes Yes
InsuranceUp to $250M for assets where BitGo Bank & Trust holds all keys (Lloyd's of London and European market syndicate)$500M specie market insurance placed in the Lloyd's of London market via Aon, plus a crypto crime policy
Assets supported1,770500
Staking Yes Yes
API access Yes Yes
Licenses & chartersOCC national trust bank charter (US), NYDFS limited purpose trust charter (US), FinCEN MSB registration and state MTLs (US), SEC broker-dealer registration (US), BaFin MiCA CASP authorization (Germany), VQF SRO membership under FINMA oversight (Switzerland), VARA custody license (Dubai, UAE), VARA broker-dealer license (Dubai, UAE), MAS Major Payment Institution license (Singapore), FINTRAC foreign MSB registration (Canada)SEC broker-dealer registration, FINRA member (US), VQF SRO financial intermediary registration (Switzerland)
MPC Yes Yes
Cold storage Yes Yes
Qualified custodian YesNot disclosed
Company
Founded20132018
HeadquartersUnited States—
InvestorsValor Equity Partners, Redpoint Ventures, Public, Galaxy Digital +1Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Up to $250M insurance from a Lloyd's and European market syndicate where BitGo holds all keys
  • Qualified custody fully backed by cold storage, with over 95% of client assets held cold at the end of 2025
  • Licensed by the OCC, NYDFS, BaFin under MiCA, Dubai's VARA and Singapore's MAS
  • Over 1,770 supported assets as of December 31, 2025
  • ClearLoop off-exchange settlement links custody to exchanges including OKX, Coinbase, Bybit and Deribit
  • 2-of-3 MPC vaults with a third-party shard holder and segregated, off-balance-sheet wallets
  • $500M of specie insurance placed at Lloyd's of London through Aon, plus a crypto crime policy
  • Custody for 500+ assets on 40+ blockchains and staking on 20 networks
Cons
  • Material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting disclosed in its FY2025 10-K
  • Securities class action filed in June 2026, and the Galaxy Digital suit was awaiting a ruling as of August 2026
  • COO left in October 2026 and the CFO is transitioning out
  • Insurance excludes hot wallets and setups where clients hold keys
  • Swiss contracting entity holds a VQF registration but no FINMA license
  • Liechtenstein registration waived and ADGM permissions withdrawn in September 2026
  • Company has sought a buyer since at least May 2026, and the CEO changed in September
  • US qualified custody rests on a broker-dealer approved only in August 2026
Best forFunds and ETF issuers needing a long asset list and published insurance, Global firms that want licensed entities in the US, EU, Dubai and Singapore, Exchanges and fintechs building wallets on an APITrading firms that keep collateral in custody while trading on centralized exchanges, Hedge funds running derivatives positions on Deribit, OKX or Bybit, Institutions staking across many proof-of-stake networks

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons