BingX vs SimpleSwap
How BingX vs SimpleSwap compare on our ratings, exchange specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 3.3/5 | 4.1/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Fees | 3.5 | 3.0 |
| Security & trust | 2.5 | 4.0 |
| Asset selection | 4.5 | 5.0 |
| Ease of use | 3.5 | 4.5 |
| Support | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Specs | ||
| Markets | Spot, Futures, Copy trading | Spot |
| Maker fee | 0.02% | Not disclosed |
| Taker fee | 0.05% | Not disclosed |
| Coins listed | 599 | 2,800 |
| Fiat deposit methods | Not disclosed | Card |
| KYC required | Not disclosed | No |
| Proof of reserves | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Staking / earn | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Mobile app | Yes | Yes |
| Licenses & registrations | AUSTRAC registration, Australia, FSC Mauritius license for CFD services, Mauritius, MiCAR license, Europe | Not disclosed |
| Security features | Merkle Tree proof of reserves, Shield Fund, Futures insurance fund | Non-custodial architecture, Direct wallet settlements |
| Futures & perpetuals | Yes | No |
| Copy trading | Yes | No |
| P2P market | Yes | No |
| Earn / savings products | Yes | Not disclosed |
| User protection fund | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Referral program | Yes | Yes |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2018 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | British Virgin Islands | — |
| Investors | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Multi-asset market traders, Copy-trading users, Perpetual-futures traders | Registration-free crypto-to-crypto swaps, Non-custodial cross-chain transfers, Trading rare altcoins without CEX balances |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.