B2Broker vs Swapzone

How B2Broker vs Swapzone compare on our ratings, exchange specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.2/54.0/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Fees3.54.5
Security & trust4.53.5
Asset selection4.54.5
Ease of use4.04.0
Support4.54.0
Specs
MarketsSpot, Margin, Copy trading, OTCSpot
Maker feeNot disclosed0%
Taker feeNot disclosed0%
Coins listedNot disclosed3,000
Fiat deposit methodsBank transfer, CardNot disclosed
KYC required Yes No
Proof of reservesNot disclosed No
Staking / earnNot disclosed No
Licenses & registrationsMauritius FSC, CySEC, NBRBNot disclosed
Security featuresNot disclosedNon-custodial routing, SSL encryption, Partner KYC risk indicators
Futures & perpetuals Yes No
Max leverage (x)1,000Not disclosed
Copy trading Yes No
P2P marketNot disclosed No
Earn / savings productsNot disclosed No
User protection fundNot disclosed No
Referral programNot disclosed Yes
Company
Founded20142019
Headquarters—Georgia
InvestorsNot disclosedNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Turnkey liquidity across 11 asset classes and 1,500 instruments via single margin
  • Stablecoin settlements in USDT and USDC across 10 separate blockchains
  • Regulated operating arms hold CySEC and Mauritius FSC licenses
  • Established track record since 2014 with over 500 broker launches
  • Swapzone charges 0% in platform fees for swaps
  • No user account creation or personal data registration required
  • Compares offers across more than 30 instant swap services
  • Surfaces partner KYC likelihood and historical execution speeds upfront
Cons
  • Does not accept retail traders or individual investor accounts
  • Requires corporate counterparty clearing through distinct legal entities
  • High leverage up to 1:1000 is restricted to unregulated jurisdictions
  • Counterparty risk depends on third-party exchange partners fulfilling trades
  • Partner exchanges can freeze deposits under their own AML and KYC rules
  • No traditional order book, spot limit orders, or derivatives trading
  • Network gas fees and partner spreads are embedded into quoted rates
Best forBrokers launching white-label crypto exchanges, Institutional desks needing multi-asset liquidity, Firms operating cTrader prop trading programsTraders wanting non-custodial swaps, Users avoiding account registration, Cross-chain rate comparison

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons