B2Broker vs Nash

B2Broker4.2/5

VS

Nash3.7/5

Feature	B2BrokerVisit	NashVisit
Ratings
Our score	4.2/5	3.7/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Fees	3.5	4.0
Security & trust	4.5	4.5
Asset selection	4.5	3.0
Ease of use	4.0	3.5
Support	4.5	3.0
Specs
Markets	Spot, Margin, Copy trading, OTC	Spot
Maker fee	Not disclosed	0%
Fiat deposit methods	Bank transfer, Card	Bank transfer, Card, SEPA
KYC required	Yes	Yes
Accepts US customers	Not disclosed	No
Staking / earn	Not disclosed	Yes
Mobile app	Not disclosed	Yes
Licenses & registrations	Mauritius FSC, CySEC, NBRB	Modulr Finance B.V. DNB EMI, MiCA pending AFM
Security features	Not disclosed	Non-custodial, MPC co-signing, Address whitelisting, Custom withdrawal limits
Futures & perpetuals	Yes	No
Max leverage (x)	1,000	Not disclosed
Copy trading	Yes	No
P2P market	Not disclosed	No
Earn / savings products	Not disclosed	Yes
Referral program	Not disclosed	Yes
Company
Founded	2014	—
Headquarters	—	Liechtenstein
Investors	Not disclosed	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Turnkey liquidity across 11 asset classes and 1,500 instruments via single margin Stablecoin settlements in USDT and USDC across 10 separate blockchains Regulated operating arms hold CySEC and Mauritius FSC licenses Established track record since 2014 with over 500 broker launches	Non-custodial architecture eliminates centralized exchange holding and insolvency risk Zero percent maker fee on exchange trades SEPA Instant settlement via dedicated personal Dutch euro IBAN accounts Card spending features automated Bitcoin round-up conversions
Cons	Does not accept retail traders or individual investor accounts Requires corporate counterparty clearing through distinct legal entities High leverage up to 1:1000 is restricted to unregulated jurisdictions	Fiat ramp and high-yield Earn accounts temporarily paused pending Dutch MiCA approval Fiat payment features and IBAN accounts are restricted to EEA and Swiss residents Direct banking services support only euro transactions Private key export from seed phrases is accessible only on the web app
Best for	Brokers launching white-label crypto exchanges, Institutional desks needing multi-asset liquidity, Firms operating cTrader prop trading programs	EEA traders requiring self-custody, Euro banking SEPA users, Zero-fee order book makers

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons