B2Broker vs Kraken

How B2Broker vs Kraken compare on our ratings, exchange specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Kraken3.7/5
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.2/53.7/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Fees3.53.0
Security & trust4.54.0
Asset selection4.54.5
Ease of use4.04.0
Support4.53.0
Specs
MarketsSpot, Margin, Copy trading, OTCSpot, Futures, Margin, OTC
Coins listedNot disclosed600
Fiat deposit methodsBank transfer, CardNot disclosed
KYC required YesNot disclosed
Accepts US customersNot disclosed Yes
Staking / earnNot disclosed Yes
Mobile appNot disclosed Yes
Licenses & registrationsMauritius FSC, CySEC, NBRBWyoming SPDI bank charter, SEC broker-dealer registration, SEC investment adviser registration, FinCEN MSB registration, Money Transmitter licenses in 46 US jurisdictions, Canadian Restricted Dealer registration, FINTRAC MSB registration, Bermuda Class F Digital Asset Business license, CySEC Investment Firm license, Central Bank of Ireland EMI license, Central Bank of Ireland MiCA CASP authorizations, FCA cryptoasset registration, AUSTRAC registration, ASIC registration, Japan FSA registration, VASP registrations in Spain, Ireland and Italy
Security featuresNot disclosedAPI key permissions excluding withdrawals, HMAC-SHA512 authentication, Self-custody wallet
Futures & perpetuals Yes Yes
Max leverage (x)1,00010
Copy trading YesNot disclosed
Earn / savings productsNot disclosed Yes
Referral programNot disclosed Yes
Company
Founded20142011
Headquarters—United States
InvestorsNot disclosedSBI Holdings, 2,263 individual investors, Bitcoin Opportunity Fund, Hummingbird Ventures +3
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Turnkey liquidity across 11 asset classes and 1,500 instruments via single margin
  • Stablecoin settlements in USDT and USDC across 10 separate blockchains
  • Regulated operating arms hold CySEC and Mauritius FSC licenses
  • Established track record since 2014 with over 500 broker launches
  • 600+ crypto pairs and 11,000+ stocks and ETFs
  • Derivatives available with up to 10x leverage
  • Regulated entities across the US, UK, EU and other markets
  • REST, WebSocket and FIX 4.4 API access
Cons
  • Does not accept retail traders or individual investor accounts
  • Requires corporate counterparty clearing through distinct legal entities
  • High leverage up to 1:1000 is restricted to unregulated jurisdictions
  • Centralized custody exposes balances to withdrawal and counterparty risk
  • Derivatives and margin access vary by jurisdiction and eligibility
  • Kraken is not licensed or regulated in Singapore
  • US equities are limited to eligible US customers and states
Best forBrokers launching white-label crypto exchanges, Institutional desks needing multi-asset liquidity, Firms operating cTrader prop trading programsActive crypto traders, Institutional trading desks, API-based trading systems

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons