Autograph vs Manifold

Autograph3.0/5

VS

Manifold4.0/5

Feature	AutographVisit	ManifoldVisit
Ratings
Our score	3.0/5	4.0/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Fees	2.5	3.5
Selection	3.0	3.5
Ease of use	3.5	4.0
Creator tools	2.0	5.0
Trust & safety	4.0	4.0
Specs
KYC required	Not disclosed	No
Chains	Ethereum, Polygon	Ethereum, Base
Creator royalties	Not disclosed	Enforced
Focus	Collectibles	Art
Launchpad	Yes	Yes
Aggregates other markets	Not disclosed	No
Mobile app	Yes	No
Points or rewards program	Yes	No
Company
Founded	2021	2020
Headquarters	United States	—
Investors	Not disclosed	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Backed by a $170M Series B co-led by Andreessen Horowitz and Kleiner Perkins Partnerships with notable athletes and entertainers Polygon integration allows lower gas costs on select mints compared to mainnet Ethereum Bridges digital collectibles with real-world fan access	Smart contracts remain fully owned and controlled by the creator wallet No identity verification or KYC needed to mint or purchase Supports Ethereum, Base, and OP Mainnet network deployments Built-in burn-and-redeem and open edition drop mechanics
Cons	January 2025 merger with Future ended Autograph's standalone operating structure Autograph conducted layoffs in 2023, reducing its workforce to approximately 30 employees	Secondary trading volume and fee revenue are low compared to major aggregators Asset uploads depend on Arweave availability and can experience downtime Creators must manage their own contract deployment gas costs
Best for	Sports memorabilia collectors, Fans seeking athlete access, Mainstream collectors entering Web3	Digital artists deploying independent contracts, Creators hosting burn-and-redeem drops, Collectors buying 1-of-1 Ethereum art

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons