AtomicHub vs sudoswap

AtomicHub3.8/5

VS

sudoswap3.5/5

Feature	AtomicHubVisit	sudoswapVisit
Ratings
Our score	3.8/5	3.5/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Fees	3.5	4.5
Selection	3.5	2.5
Ease of use	4.0	3.5
Creator tools	4.0	3.0
Trust & safety	4.0	4.0
Specs
KYC required	Not disclosed	No
Chains	Polygon, Avalanche, Other	Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Other
Marketplace fee	Not disclosed	0.5%
Creator royalties	Enforced	Enforced
Focus	Gaming, Collectibles, Art	Collectibles
Launchpad	Yes	Not disclosed
Mobile app	Not disclosed	No
Token	Not disclosed	SUDO
Zero marketplace fee	Not disclosed	No
Company
Founded	—	2022
Headquarters	Germany	—
Investors	Not disclosed	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Over 63 million completed secondary sales across 141K collections Direct support for major gaming ecosystems including WAX, Polygon, and Immutable Self-custodial trading without centralized asset custody requirements Integrated creator suite for collection minting and royalty configuration	Platform trading fee is 0.5% Provides instant liquidity without waiting for individual counterparty bids Non-custodial trading across Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, and Berachain Public smart contract audits published on GitHub
Cons	Smart contract dependency when bridging assets across distinct networks Secondary trading for niche gaming collections can experience low market liquidity Trading activity remains concentrated primarily on WAX-compatible gaming collections	Low liquidity on smaller collections leads to high price slippage TVL of about $1.03M limits capacity for large NFT trades No mobile application for iOS or Android
Best for	WAX blockchain gaming collectors, Digital trading card enthusiasts, Creators launching multi-chain drops	NFT liquidity providers, Traders needing instant pool execution, Arbitrageurs trading floor-price collections

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons