AtomicHub vs Stargaze

AtomicHub3.8/5

VS

Stargaze3.4/5

Feature	AtomicHubVisit	StargazeVisit
Ratings
Our score	3.8/5	3.4/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Fees	3.5	3.0
Selection	3.5	3.0
Ease of use	4.0	3.5
Creator tools	4.0	4.0
Trust & safety	4.0	3.5
Specs
Chains	Polygon, Avalanche, Other	Cosmos
Creator royalties	Enforced	Not disclosed
Focus	Gaming, Collectibles, Art	Collectibles, Art
Launchpad	Yes	Yes
Token	Not disclosed	STARS
Points or rewards program	Not disclosed	Yes
Company
Founded	—	2021
Headquarters	Germany	—
Investors	Not disclosed	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Over 63 million completed secondary sales across 141K collections Direct support for major gaming ecosystems including WAX, Polygon, and Immutable Self-custodial trading without centralized asset custody requirements Integrated creator suite for collection minting and royalty configuration	Active ecosystem trading denominated natively in ATOM and STARS Integrated launchpad for creating and minting primary collections Uses ICS-721 for cross-chain NFT transfers across IBC
Cons	Smart contract dependency when bridging assets across distinct networks Secondary trading for niche gaming collections can experience low market liquidity Trading activity remains concentrated primarily on WAX-compatible gaming collections	Trading volume is concentrated in a small group of collections Migration from standalone L1 to Cosmos Hub introduces contract transition risks Exposure to price volatility in STARS and ATOM
Best for	WAX blockchain gaming collectors, Digital trading card enthusiasts, Creators launching multi-chain drops	Cosmos NFT collectors, Creators launching IBC collections, Holders trading in ATOM

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons