AtomicHub vs Magic Eden

AtomicHub3.8/5

VS

Magic Eden3.2/5

Feature	AtomicHubVisit	Magic EdenVisit
Ratings
Our score	3.8/5	3.2/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Fees	3.5	3.5
Selection	3.5	3.0
Ease of use	4.0	3.0
Creator tools	4.0	3.0
Trust & safety	4.0	3.5
Specs
Chains	Polygon, Avalanche, Other	Solana
Marketplace fee	Not disclosed	0%
Creator royalties	Enforced	Not disclosed
Focus	Gaming, Collectibles, Art	Collectibles, Art, Gaming
Launchpad	Yes	Not disclosed
Token	Not disclosed	ME
Zero marketplace fee	Not disclosed	Yes
Points or rewards program	Not disclosed	Yes
Company
Founded	—	2021
Headquarters	Germany	—
Investors	Not disclosed	Electric Capital, Greylock, Paradigm, 6th Man Ventures +6
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Over 63 million completed secondary sales across 141K collections Direct support for major gaming ecosystems including WAX, Polygon, and Immutable Self-custodial trading without centralized asset custody requirements Integrated creator suite for collection minting and royalty configuration	Focused Solana marketplace after March 2026 0% NFT listing fee Supports art, collectibles and gaming NFTs ME token ecosystem includes staking mechanics
Cons	Smart contract dependency when bridging assets across distinct networks Secondary trading for niche gaming collections can experience low market liquidity Trading activity remains concentrated primarily on WAX-compatible gaming collections	Bitcoin Ordinals and EVM marketplaces closed in March 2026 Former multi-chain wallet retired on 1 April 2026 Solana-only focus concentrates chain and liquidity exposure NFT markets remain vulnerable to phishing and fake collections
Best for	WAX blockchain gaming collectors, Digital trading card enthusiasts, Creators launching multi-chain drops	Solana NFT collectors, Solana NFT creators, Art and gaming collections

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons