AtomicHub vs LooksRare
How AtomicHub vs LooksRare compare on our ratings, nft marketplace specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 3.8/5 | 3.5/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Fees | 3.5 | 4.5 |
| Selection | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Ease of use | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Creator tools | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| Trust & safety | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| Specs | ||
| KYC required | Not disclosed | No |
| Chains | Polygon, Avalanche, Other | Ethereum |
| Marketplace fee | Not disclosed | 0.5% |
| Creator royalties | Enforced | Not disclosed |
| Focus | Gaming, Collectibles, Art | Art, Collectibles, Gaming |
| Launchpad | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Aggregates other markets | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Token | Not disclosed | LOOKS |
| Zero marketplace fee | Not disclosed | No |
| Points or rewards program | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Company | ||
| Founded | — | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Germany | — |
| Investors | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | WAX blockchain gaming collectors, Digital trading card enthusiasts, Creators launching multi-chain drops | Ethereum NFT collectors and flippers, Traders executing direct private sales, LOOKS token stakers seeking protocol yields |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.