AtomicHub vs Blur
How AtomicHub vs Blur compare on our ratings, nft marketplace specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 3.8/5 | 3.5/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Fees | 3.5 | 5.0 |
| Selection | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Ease of use | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Creator tools | 4.0 | 2.0 |
| Trust & safety | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Specs | ||
| KYC required | Not disclosed | No |
| Chains | Polygon, Avalanche, Other | Ethereum, Other |
| Marketplace fee | Not disclosed | 0% |
| Creator royalties | Enforced | Optional |
| Focus | Gaming, Collectibles, Art | Collectibles, Art |
| Launchpad | Yes | No |
| Aggregates other markets | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Mobile app | Not disclosed | No |
| Token | Not disclosed | BLUR |
| Zero marketplace fee | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Points or rewards program | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Company | ||
| Founded | — | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Germany | — |
| Investors | Not disclosed | Paradigm, 0xMaki, eGirl Capital, Collab+Currency |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | WAX blockchain gaming collectors, Digital trading card enthusiasts, Creators launching multi-chain drops | Ethereum high-volume NFT traders, Traders batch sweeping collection floors, Borrowers seeking peer-to-peer NFT loans |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.