AtomicHub vs Autograph

AtomicHub3.8/5

VS

Autograph3.0/5

Feature	AtomicHubVisit	AutographVisit
Ratings
Our score	3.8/5	3.0/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Fees	3.5	2.5
Selection	3.5	3.0
Ease of use	4.0	3.5
Creator tools	4.0	2.0
Trust & safety	4.0	4.0
Specs
Chains	Polygon, Avalanche, Other	Ethereum, Polygon
Creator royalties	Enforced	Not disclosed
Focus	Gaming, Collectibles, Art	Collectibles
Launchpad	Yes	Yes
Mobile app	Not disclosed	Yes
Points or rewards program	Not disclosed	Yes
Company
Founded	—	2021
Headquarters	Germany	United States
Investors	Not disclosed	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Over 63 million completed secondary sales across 141K collections Direct support for major gaming ecosystems including WAX, Polygon, and Immutable Self-custodial trading without centralized asset custody requirements Integrated creator suite for collection minting and royalty configuration	Backed by a $170M Series B co-led by Andreessen Horowitz and Kleiner Perkins Partnerships with notable athletes and entertainers Polygon integration allows lower gas costs on select mints compared to mainnet Ethereum Bridges digital collectibles with real-world fan access
Cons	Smart contract dependency when bridging assets across distinct networks Secondary trading for niche gaming collections can experience low market liquidity Trading activity remains concentrated primarily on WAX-compatible gaming collections	January 2025 merger with Future ended Autograph's standalone operating structure Autograph conducted layoffs in 2023, reducing its workforce to approximately 30 employees
Best for	WAX blockchain gaming collectors, Digital trading card enthusiasts, Creators launching multi-chain drops	Sports memorabilia collectors, Fans seeking athlete access, Mainstream collectors entering Web3

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons