Arweave vs NEAR Protocol

How Arweave vs NEAR Protocol compare on our ratings, blockchain specs, funding, pros and cons.

Arweave3.8/5
VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score3.8/54.1/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Performance3.54.5
Fees4.04.5
Ecosystem4.03.5
Decentralization4.04.0
Developer experience3.54.0
Specs
LayerLayer 1Layer 1
Consensus / designOtherProof of Stake
Native tokenARNEAR
EVM compatible No No
Smart contract languagesNot disclosedRust, JavaScript
Block timeNot disclosed600ms
Typical transaction feeOne-time upfront fee in AR, dynamic based on data size and network conditionsNot disclosed
FinalityNot disclosed1.2s
Validators / sequencerMiners and validatorsNot disclosed
Mainnet since2,0182,020
Throughput (TPS)Not disclosed1000000
SequencerNot applicableNot applicable
Data availabilityDecentralized permanent storage through the Arweave weave and storage endowment modelNEAR Protocol
Gas paid inARNEAR
Company
Founded20182020
Headquarters—Switzerland
InvestorsNot disclosedAndreessen Horowitz, Accomplice, Metastable Capital, Arrington Capital +6
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • One-time upfront fee for permanent decentralized data storage
  • Proof of Access consensus rewards nodes for preserving historical archives
  • AO Computer enables parallel computing on top of immutable storage
  • Fast 1.2-second transaction finality with 600ms block times
  • Cross-chain swap execution across 35+ separate blockchain networks
  • Sub-cent execution fees on NEAR Intents transactions
  • Annual token issuance reduced from 5% to 2.5% in October 2025
Cons
  • Data uploads are immutable and cannot be deleted or modified
  • Addresses are incompatible with standard Ethereum accounts despite shared secp256k1 curves
  • Node operators face legal and GDPR compliance risks for hosted content
  • Malicious packages targeted ecosystem npm developer libraries in June 2026
  • Not natively EVM-compatible at the primary Layer-1 execution level
  • Cross-chain intents face reorg exposure on connected networks, including a $600K incident in April 2026
  • Historical exploits in third-party ecosystem contracts, including $3M lost on Skyward Finance in 2022
Best forPermanent decentralized web hosting, Long-term data and AI archive preservation, Developers deploying autonomous on-chain agentsDevelopers writing smart contracts in Rust, Users swapping across chains without manual bridges, Teams deploying autonomous AI agent systems

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons