Art Blocks vs Stargaze

How Art Blocks vs Stargaze compare on our ratings, nft marketplace specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score3.9/53.4/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Fees3.53.0
Selection3.03.0
Ease of use4.03.5
Creator tools4.54.0
Trust & safety4.53.5
Specs
KYC required NoNot disclosed
ChainsEthereum, Arbitrum, BaseCosmos
Marketplace fee2.5%Not disclosed
Creator royaltiesEnforcedNot disclosed
FocusArtCollectibles, Art
Launchpad Yes Yes
Aggregates other markets NoNot disclosed
Mobile app YesNot disclosed
TokenNot disclosedSTARS
Zero marketplace fee NoNot disclosed
Points or rewards program No Yes
Company
Founded20202021
HeadquartersUnited States—
InvestorsNot disclosedNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Artwork scripts are stored and executed directly on-chain rather than on centralized servers
  • Multichain support covers Ethereum mainnet, Arbitrum, and Base
  • Enforces creator royalties on secondary market trades
  • Over $1B in cumulative platform trading volume
  • Active ecosystem trading denominated natively in ATOM and STARS
  • Integrated launchpad for creating and minting primary collections
  • Uses ICS-721 for cross-chain NFT transfers across IBC
Cons
  • Charges a 2.5% secondary marketplace fee
  • Secondary trading liquidity remains thin outside of top curated collections
  • High Ethereum network gas fees can significantly inflate primary minting costs
  • Trading volume is concentrated in a small group of collections
  • Migration from standalone L1 to Cosmos Hub introduces contract transition risks
  • Exposure to price volatility in STARS and ATOM
Best forGenerative digital art collectors, Creative coders releasing algorithmic art, Non-custodial collectors using Ethereum and layer-2sCosmos NFT collectors, Creators launching IBC collections, Holders trading in ATOM

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.