Arculus vs ELLIPAL

Arculus3.8/5

VS

ELLIPAL4.1/5

Feature	ArculusVisit	ELLIPALVisit
Ratings
Our score	3.8/5	4.1/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Security	3.5	4.5
Build & design	4.0	4.5
Ease of use	4.0	3.5
Coin support	4.5	4.5
Value for money	3.0	3.5
Specs
Price from	Not disclosed	$169
Connectivity	NFC	QR code (air-gapped), microSD
Secure element	Yes	Yes
Firmware	Not disclosed	Closed source
Display	No screen	Touchscreen
Air-gapped signing	Not disclosed	Yes
Bitcoin-only	No	No
Supported assets	10,000	10,000
Battery	No	Yes
Companion app	Arculus App	ELLIPAL mobile app for iOS and Android
Touchscreen	No	Yes
Backup options	Recovery phrase	Seed phrase recovery sheets, MicroSD card
NFC	Yes	Not disclosed
Company
Founded	—	2018
Headquarters	—	—
Investors	Not disclosed	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Three-factor access combines a card, PIN and biometric check NFC design needs no cable or battery and does not require charging Supports 10,000+ assets across 27 blockchains No Arculus fee for sending or receiving crypto	QR-only signing keeps the wallet physically separate from phones CC EAL5+ secure element protects Titan 2.0 key storage Intrusion detection wipes stored data after physical opening Supports more than 10,000 cryptocurrencies
Cons	Daily access depends on the Arculus mobile app Losing the recovery phrase can prevent recovery if the card is also unavailable Buy, sell and swap fees come from liquidity partners MetaMask and WalletConnect access depends on supported integrations	Titan 2.0 firmware is proprietary and closed-source $169 price Physical opening can wipe stored data Seed phrase loss can make wiped funds unrecoverable
Best for	Long-term self-custody, Phone-based cold storage, Multi-chain asset holders	Long-term self-custody, QR-based transaction signing, Touchscreen wallet users

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons