Arbitrum vs TON

How Arbitrum vs TON compare on our ratings, blockchain specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
TON3.6/5
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.2/53.6/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Performance4.54.5
Fees4.54.5
Ecosystem5.03.5
Decentralization3.03.0
Developer experience4.53.0
Specs
LayerLayer 2Layer 1
Consensus / designOptimistic rollupProof of Stake
Native tokenARBGRAM
EVM compatible Yes No
Smart contract languagesSolidity, Rust (Stylus)Tolk, FunC, Tact
Block time~0.25 seconds~0.4s
Typical transaction feeNot disclosed0.00039 Gram
Finality~7 days (dispute window)~0.6s
Validators / sequencerNot disclosed384
Mainnet since2,0212,021
Throughput (TPS)Not disclosed100,000+
SequencerCentralizedNot applicable
Data availabilityEthereum L1 calldata / EIP-4844 blobsNot disclosed
Gas paid inETHGRAM
Company
Founded20212018
HeadquartersUnited States—
InvestorsCoinbase Ventures, IOSG Ventures, OKX Ventures, ParaFi Capital +1Private SAFT Investors, Hypersphere, Mirana Ventures
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Secured over $12.3B in value with 2.7 billion lifetime transactions by mid-2026
  • Supports smart contracts in Rust, C, and C++ alongside standard EVM Solidity
  • Fast sub-second block times around 0.25 seconds with gas settled in ETH
  • Native access to Telegram users via embedded non-custodial wallets
  • Sub-second settlement with 0.4-second block times and 0.6-second finality
  • Fixed base fees of 0.00039 Gram per transfer regardless of network load
  • Over 1.4 billion circulating native USDt on the network as of October 2026
Cons
  • Sequencer remains centralized, creating liveness and transaction ordering dependencies
  • ARB staking through the DAO does not distribute protocol fee revenue to holders
  • Substantial non-circulating ARB supply remains subject to scheduled token unlocks
  • High validator staking requirement of roughly 1 million Gram limits solo validation
  • DeFi liquidity and total value locked remain significantly lower than Ethereum and Solana
  • Cross-chain bridge exploit in May 2026 led to $2.8 million in losses
  • Non-EVM architecture requires developers to learn custom languages like Tact and FunC
Best forHigh-frequency DeFi traders, Rust and Solidity smart contract developers, Teams launching dedicated Orbit appchainsTelegram mini-app developers, Low-cost peer-to-peer stablecoin transfers, Mass token and NFT airdrops

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons