Arbitrum vs Coinweb

How Arbitrum vs Coinweb compare on our ratings, blockchain specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Coinweb3.4/5
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.2/53.4/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Performance4.53.5
Fees4.53.5
Ecosystem5.03.0
Decentralization3.03.5
Developer experience4.53.5
Specs
LayerLayer 2Layer 2
Consensus / designOptimistic rollupOther
Native tokenARBCWEB
EVM compatible Yes Yes
Smart contract languagesSolidity, Rust (Stylus)Not disclosed
Block time~0.25 secondsNot disclosed
Finality~7 days (dispute window)Not disclosed
Mainnet since2,021Not disclosed
Throughput (TPS)Not disclosedUp to 32,000 on BNB Chain, 12,000 on Polygon, 2,000 on Ethereum
SequencerCentralizedNot disclosed
Data availabilityEthereum L1 calldata / EIP-4844 blobsUnderlying base layer blockchains
Gas paid inETHCWEB
Company
Founded20212017
HeadquartersUnited States—
InvestorsCoinbase Ventures, IOSG Ventures, OKX Ventures, ParaFi Capital +1Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Secured over $12.3B in value with 2.7 billion lifetime transactions by mid-2026
  • Supports smart contracts in Rust, C, and C++ alongside standard EVM Solidity
  • Fast sub-second block times around 0.25 seconds with gas settled in ETH
  • Eliminates intermediate bridge consensus sets by verifying base-layer data directly
  • Optimizes data footprints down to 1,250 gas per EVM transaction
  • Runs autonomous contracts powered by a single gas token across 12 blockchains
  • Demonstrated stability during external network halts on connected base layers
Cons
  • Sequencer remains centralized, creating liveness and transaction ordering dependencies
  • ARB staking through the DAO does not distribute protocol fee revenue to holders
  • Substantial non-circulating ARB supply remains subject to scheduled token unlocks
  • Kubernetes-targeted node deployments mean fewer independent node installations than standard L1s
  • Cross-chain transaction finality remains bounded by underlying base layer settlement times
  • Protocol smart contract execution requires holding and managing balances of CWEB
Best forHigh-frequency DeFi traders, Rust and Solidity smart contract developers, Teams launching dedicated Orbit appchainsCross-chain dApp developers, Multi-network automated smart contracts, Token issuers avoiding base-chain gas requirements

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons