Arax vs Polygon

Arax2.5/5

VS

Polygon4.1/5

Feature	AraxVisit	PolygonVisit
Ratings
Our score	2.5/5	4.1/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Performance	2.5	4.5
Fees	2.5	4.5
Ecosystem	3.0	4.5
Decentralization	2.0	3.5
Developer experience	2.5	4.0
Specs
Layer	Not disclosed	Sidechain
Consensus / design	Not disclosed	Proof of Stake
Native token	Not disclosed	POL
EVM compatible	Not disclosed	Yes
Smart contract languages	Not disclosed	Solidity
Typical transaction fee	Not disclosed	$0.002
Finality	Not disclosed	~1.8 seconds
Mainnet since	Not disclosed	2,020
Throughput (TPS)	Not disclosed	5,000
Sequencer	Not disclosed	Not applicable
Gas paid in	Not disclosed	POL
Company
Founded	—	2020
Headquarters	—	Cayman Islands
Investors	Not disclosed	Peak XV Partners, Galaxy Digital, Republic Capital, SoftBank Vision Fund 2 +4
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Participated in the NATO DIANA defense innovation accelerator program Offers no-code smart contract generation for real-world asset tokenization Integrates DePIN mesh delivery networks for reduced enterprise bandwidth costs Supports regulated RWA trading on partner exchanges including Ping Exchange	Typical transaction fees average approximately $0.002 per transfer Settlement finality completes in roughly 1.8 seconds Full EVM execution environment supports standard Solidity tooling and libraries Processed over 8 billion transactions across more than $3.0 trillion in cumulative volume
Cons	Integrates with Core Blockchain architecture Past filing delays at the parent company Ecosystem tools integrate with frameworks such as CorePass for digital identity functions	Relies on sidechain checkpoints rather than native Layer 2 zero-knowledge rollups Bridge smart contracts on Ethereum introduce third-party settlement and locking risks Past smart contract vulnerability resulted in the loss of 801,601 tokens in 2021 Separate Polygon zkEVM sequencer suffered an operational halt in July 2026
Best for	Enterprises tokenizing real-world commodities, Organizations tracking auditable ESG data, Corporate teams adopting DePIN infrastructure	High-frequency stablecoin payment providers, Fintech developers seeking EVM compatibility, DeFi apps requiring sub-cent fees

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons