Anchorage Digital vs Sygnum Bank
How Anchorage Digital vs Sygnum Bank compare on our ratings, custodian specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 4.1/5 | 3.8/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Security | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Compliance | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Asset support | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| Features | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| Support | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Specs | ||
| Custody model | Qualified custodian, HSM, Self-custody software | Qualified custodian |
| Clients | Institutions, Funds, Corporates, High-net-worth | Institutions, Funds, High-net-worth |
| Regulated | Yes | Yes |
| SOC 2 report | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Staking | Yes | Not disclosed |
| API access | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Licenses & charters | OCC national trust bank charter (US), NYDFS BitLicense (US), MAS Major Payment Institution license (Singapore), NFA introducing broker registration (US) | FINMA banking and securities dealer license (Switzerland), MAS Capital Markets Services license (Singapore), MAS Major Payment Institution license (Singapore), ADGM FSRA Financial Services Permission (UAE), MiCA CASP authorization (Liechtenstein) |
| Cold storage | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Qualified custodian | Yes | Yes |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2017 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | United States | Switzerland |
| Investors | Tether, KKR, GIC | Not disclosed |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | ETF issuers and asset managers that want a federally chartered custodian, Funds that stake or vote without moving assets out of custody, Trading firms using Binance with collateral held off-exchange | Hedge funds and trading firms that want exchange collateral held at a bank, High-net-worth clients and family offices seeking bank custody for crypto, Banks adding digital asset services through a partner bank |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.