Anchorage Digital vs Kraken Custody

How Anchorage Digital vs Kraken Custody compare on our ratings, custodian specs, funding, pros and cons.

Feature
Ratings
Our score4.1/54.0/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.03.5
Compliance4.04.0
Asset support4.04.5
Features4.54.5
Support4.04.0
Specs
Custody modelQualified custodian, HSM, Self-custody softwareQualified custodian, MPC, HSM
ClientsInstitutions, Funds, Corporates, High-net-worthInstitutions, Corporates, High-net-worth
Regulated Yes Yes
SOC 2 report Yes Yes
Assets supportedNot disclosed200
Staking Yes Yes
API access Yes Yes
Licenses & chartersOCC national trust bank charter (US), NYDFS BitLicense (US), MAS Major Payment Institution license (Singapore), NFA introducing broker registration (US)Wyoming Division of Banking SPDI bank charter (US), Central Bank of Ireland MiCA CASP authorization (Ireland)
MPCNot disclosed Yes
Cold storage Yes Yes
Qualified custodian Yes Yes
Company
Founded20172011
HeadquartersUnited StatesUS
InvestorsTether, KKR, GICNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Custody at an OCC-chartered national trust bank, in place since January 2021
  • SOC 1 Type 2 and SOC 2 Type 2 reports, with SOC 2 examinations since 2021
  • Staking and governance voting on 20+ networks without assets leaving custody
  • Atlas settlement supports off-exchange trading on Binance from custody
  • Kraken Financial holds a Wyoming SPDI charter, and Kraken says it meets the SEC Custody Rule's qualified custodian definition
  • Federal Reserve master account since March 4, 2026, with direct Fedwire access
  • Central Bank of Ireland MiCA authorization covers custody for EEA clients
  • More than 200 custody assets, including tokenized stocks, ETFs and Centrifuge's JAAA
Cons
  • No insurance policy for digital assets appears in its custody disclosures
  • OCC consent order over BSA/AML deficiencies ran from April 2022 to August 2025
  • No EU authorization yet; the Irish MiCA application was announced in October 2026
  • Custody launched in March 2024, so the operating record is short
  • US custody is limited to certain states, and vaults are reached only through the web
  • Parent Payward paid $30 million in 2023 to settle SEC charges over a staking-as-a-service program
  • The OCC national trust charter for Payward National Trust Company is still an application
Best forETF issuers and asset managers that want a federally chartered custodian, Funds that stake or vote without moving assets out of custody, Trading firms using Binance with collateral held off-exchangeTrading firms that want custody assets to back Kraken Prime credit, Stablecoin issuers and treasury companies that need segregated, bankruptcy-remote reserves, EEA firms that need MiCA-authorized custody from an Irish entity

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons