Anchorage Digital vs Copper

How Anchorage Digital vs Copper compare on our ratings, custodian specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Copper3.5/5
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.1/53.5/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.04.0
Compliance4.02.5
Asset support4.04.0
Features4.54.5
Support4.03.0
Specs
Custody modelQualified custodian, HSM, Self-custody softwareNot disclosed
ClientsInstitutions, Funds, Corporates, High-net-worthInstitutions, Funds
Regulated Yes Yes
SOC 2 report Yes Yes
InsuranceNot disclosed$500M specie market insurance placed in the Lloyd's of London market via Aon, plus a crypto crime policy
Assets supportedNot disclosed500
Staking Yes Yes
API access Yes Yes
Licenses & chartersOCC national trust bank charter (US), NYDFS BitLicense (US), MAS Major Payment Institution license (Singapore), NFA introducing broker registration (US)SEC broker-dealer registration, FINRA member (US), VQF SRO financial intermediary registration (Switzerland)
MPCNot disclosed Yes
Cold storage Yes Yes
Qualified custodian YesNot disclosed
Company
Founded20172018
HeadquartersUnited States—
InvestorsTether, KKR, GICNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Custody at an OCC-chartered national trust bank, in place since January 2021
  • SOC 1 Type 2 and SOC 2 Type 2 reports, with SOC 2 examinations since 2021
  • Staking and governance voting on 20+ networks without assets leaving custody
  • Atlas settlement supports off-exchange trading on Binance from custody
  • ClearLoop off-exchange settlement links custody to exchanges including OKX, Coinbase, Bybit and Deribit
  • 2-of-3 MPC vaults with a third-party shard holder and segregated, off-balance-sheet wallets
  • $500M of specie insurance placed at Lloyd's of London through Aon, plus a crypto crime policy
  • Custody for 500+ assets on 40+ blockchains and staking on 20 networks
Cons
  • No insurance policy for digital assets appears in its custody disclosures
  • OCC consent order over BSA/AML deficiencies ran from April 2022 to August 2025
  • No EU authorization yet; the Irish MiCA application was announced in October 2026
  • Swiss contracting entity holds a VQF registration but no FINMA license
  • Liechtenstein registration waived and ADGM permissions withdrawn in September 2026
  • Company has sought a buyer since at least May 2026, and the CEO changed in September
  • US qualified custody rests on a broker-dealer approved only in August 2026
Best forETF issuers and asset managers that want a federally chartered custodian, Funds that stake or vote without moving assets out of custody, Trading firms using Binance with collateral held off-exchangeTrading firms that keep collateral in custody while trading on centralized exchanges, Hedge funds running derivatives positions on Deribit, OKX or Bybit, Institutions staking across many proof-of-stake networks

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons