Alchemy vs Consensys
How Alchemy vs Consensys compare on our ratings, infrastructure provider specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 4.3/5 | 4.0/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Reliability | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Chain coverage | 4.5 | 3.0 |
| Pricing | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Developer experience | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Support | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Specs | ||
| Services | RPC / nodes, Data APIs, Wallet APIs, Account abstraction, Developer tooling | RPC / nodes, Developer tooling, Staking infrastructure, Wallet APIs |
| Chains supported | 100 | 25 |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing from | $0.525 per 1,000,000 compute units | Not disclosed |
| Enterprise SLA | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Uptime SLA | 99.99% | Not disclosed |
| Free tier limits | 30M compute units per month, up to 15 RPS, 5 apps, 5 webhooks | Not disclosed |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2017 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | United States | United States |
| Investors | Archetype | ParaFi Capital, Third Point Ventures, JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Multichain application teams, Solana developers, Account-abstraction products | Ethereum dApp developers, Institutions running dedicated staking validators, Teams building on Linea |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.