Alchemy vs Chronicle

Alchemy4.3/5

VS

Chronicle3.6/5

Feature	AlchemyVisit	ChronicleVisit
Ratings
Our score	4.3/5	3.6/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Reliability	4.5	4.5
Chain coverage	4.5	3.5
Pricing	4.0	3.0
Developer experience	4.5	3.5
Support	4.0	3.0
Specs
Services	RPC / nodes, Data APIs, Wallet APIs, Account abstraction, Developer tooling	Oracle
Chains supported	100	Not disclosed
Free tier	Yes	Not disclosed
Pricing from	$0.525 per 1,000,000 compute units	Not disclosed
Enterprise SLA	Yes	Not disclosed
Uptime SLA	99.99%	Not disclosed
Free tier limits	30M compute units per month, up to 15 RPS, 5 apps, 5 webhooks	Not disclosed
Company
Founded	2017	—
Headquarters	United States	Switzerland
Investors	Archetype	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	100+ supported blockchains Free tier includes 30M compute units monthly Enterprise SLAs reach 99.995% availability RPC, indexed data and wallet APIs share one platform	Originated inside MakerDAO in 2017 Provides collateral feeds for protocols including Sky, Morpho, and Centrifuge Specialized Proof of Asset framework for verifiable tokenized real-world collateral
Cons	Applications face centralised provider and outage exposure Proprietary APIs can increase vendor lock-in Pay As You Go charges scale with compute usage Automated agent wallets add transaction-control risk	Heavy exposure to off-chain appraisal quality for tokenized asset feeds Developer integration details are not as widely self-serve as generalist oracles
Best for	Multichain application teams, Solana developers, Account-abstraction products	Protocols lending against real-world assets, DeFi platforms requiring collateral data, Protocols using tokenized real-world assets

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons