Alchemy vs Bitcoin Core

How Alchemy vs Bitcoin Core compare on our ratings, infrastructure provider specs, funding, pros and cons.

Alchemy4.3/5
VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.3/53.3/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Reliability4.54.5
Chain coverage4.51.0
Pricing4.05.0
Developer experience4.54.0
Support4.01.5
Specs
ServicesRPC / nodes, Data APIs, Wallet APIs, Account abstraction, Developer toolingRPC / nodes, Developer tooling
Chains supported1001
Free tier Yes Yes
Pricing from$0.525 per 1,000,000 compute unitsFree
Enterprise SLA Yes No
Open sourceNot disclosed Yes
TokenNot disclosedBTC
Uptime SLA99.99%Not disclosed
Free tier limits30M compute units per month, up to 15 RPS, 5 apps, 5 webhooksUnlimited self-hosted use
Server regionsNot disclosedGlobal
Company
Founded20172009
HeadquartersUnited States—
InvestorsArchetypeNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • 100+ supported blockchains
  • Free tier includes 30M compute units monthly
  • Enterprise SLAs reach 99.995% availability
  • RPC, indexed data and wallet APIs share one platform
  • Free MIT-licensed software
  • Validates the Bitcoin chain locally
  • Includes wallet and RPC access
  • Open contributor and public review model
Cons
  • Applications face centralised provider and outage exposure
  • Proprietary APIs can increase vendor lock-in
  • Pay As You Go charges scale with compute usage
  • Automated agent wallets add transaction-control risk
  • Bitcoin-only chain support
  • Full ledger exceeded 608.9 GB in October 2024
  • Operators manage storage, bandwidth, upgrades, and uptime
  • A June 2026 bug could expose private broadcast IP addresses
Best forMultichain application teams, Solana developers, Account-abstraction productsBitcoin node operators, Self-hosted RPC applications, Bitcoin wallet developers

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons