Alchemy vs AuthLN

Alchemy4.3/5

VS

AuthLN3.0/5

Feature	AlchemyVisit	AuthLNVisit
Ratings
Our score	4.3/5	3.0/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Reliability	4.5	3.5
Chain coverage	4.5	3.0
Pricing	4.0	2.5
Developer experience	4.5	3.0
Support	4.0	3.0
Specs
Services	RPC / nodes, Data APIs, Wallet APIs, Account abstraction, Developer tooling	Developer tooling
Chains supported	100	Not disclosed
Free tier	Yes	Not disclosed
Pricing from	$0.525 per 1,000,000 compute units	Not disclosed
Enterprise SLA	Yes	Not disclosed
Uptime SLA	99.99%	Not disclosed
Free tier limits	30M compute units per month, up to 15 RPS, 5 apps, 5 webhooks	Not disclosed
Company
Founded	2017	2024
Headquarters	United States	United States
Investors	Archetype	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	100+ supported blockchains Free tier includes 30M compute units monthly Enterprise SLAs reach 99.995% availability RPC, indexed data and wallet APIs share one platform	Holds two issued U.S. patents covering its identity and access architecture Integrates in front of Okta, Microsoft Entra ID, Google, and JumpCloud without rerouting Logs walked-away connection attempts alongside standard successes and failures Requires no local agent installation or credential sharing for access reviews
Cons	Applications face centralised provider and outage exposure Proprietary APIs can increase vendor lock-in Pay As You Go charges scale with compute usage Automated agent wallets add transaction-control risk	Agent Authority product for automated sub-agent enforcement is not yet available SOC 2 Type II examination is not yet complete
Best for	Multichain application teams, Solana developers, Account-abstraction products	Enterprise SOC teams auditing identity providers, Organizations tracking automated AI agent access, Environments requiring post-quantum authentication protocols

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons