Agoric vs NEAR Protocol

How Agoric vs NEAR Protocol compare on our ratings, blockchain specs, funding, pros and cons.

Agoric3.6/5
VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score3.6/54.1/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Performance3.54.5
Fees4.04.5
Ecosystem2.53.5
Decentralization3.54.0
Developer experience4.54.0
Specs
LayerLayer 1Layer 1
Consensus / designProof of StakeProof of Stake
Native tokenBLDNEAR
EVM compatible No No
Smart contract languagesJavaScriptRust, JavaScript
Block timeNot disclosed600ms
FinalityNot disclosed1.2s
Mainnet since2,0212,020
Throughput (TPS)Not disclosed1000000
SequencerNot applicableNot applicable
Data availabilityNot disclosedNEAR Protocol
Gas paid inISTNEAR
Company
Founded20182020
Headquarters—Switzerland
InvestorsNaval Ravikant, Polychain Capital, The Zcash CompanyAndreessen Horowitz, Accomplice, Metastable Capital, Arrington Capital +6
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Hardened JavaScript is used for smart contract development
  • Zoe framework guarantees offer safety by refunding assets if a trade fails
  • Multi-block execution coordinates workflows across IBC chains
  • Transaction fees are paid in IST, while BLD covers cross-chain postage fees
  • Fast 1.2-second transaction finality with 600ms block times
  • Cross-chain swap execution across 35+ separate blockchain networks
  • Sub-cent execution fees on NEAR Intents transactions
  • Annual token issuance reduced from 5% to 2.5% in October 2025
Cons
  • No EVM compatibility requires rewriting existing Solidity smart contracts
  • Direct on-chain TVL is low at about $116,000 in October 2026
  • Cross-chain execution depends on relayers, IBC endpoints, and third-party bridge infrastructure
  • Asynchronous cross-chain settlement creates execution delay across remote chains
  • Not natively EVM-compatible at the primary Layer-1 execution level
  • Cross-chain intents face reorg exposure on connected networks, including a $600K incident in April 2026
  • Historical exploits in third-party ecosystem contracts, including $3M lost on Skyward Finance in 2022
Best forJavaScript developers entering Web3, Cross-chain DeFi yield automation, Complex multi-network app workflowsDevelopers writing smart contracts in Rust, Users swapping across chains without manual bridges, Teams deploying autonomous AI agent systems

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons