Across Protocol vs Orbiter Finance

How Across Protocol vs Orbiter Finance compare on our ratings, bridge specs, funding, pros and cons.

Feature
Ratings
Our score4.3/53.9/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.03.5
Speed5.04.5
Fees4.54.0
Chain coverage4.04.0
Ease of use4.54.0
Specs
KYC required No No
DesignIntent-basedLiquidity network
ChainsEthereum, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, Polygon, OtherEthereum, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, Solana, BNB Chain, Other
Chains supported27Not disclosed
Typical feeNetwork gas and relayer fee with zero aggregator markupNot disclosed
Typical transfer time1.2 secondsNot disclosed
Security modelUMA optimistic oracleMaker system
Audited YesNot disclosed
TokenACXOBT
Intent-based YesNot disclosed
Native token transfers (no wrapped tokens) Yes Yes
Max transfer$50,000,000Not disclosed
Company
Founded20212021
Headquarters—Singapore
InvestorsParadigm, Bain Capital Crypto, Coinbase Ventures, Multicoin Capital +3Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Average transfer speed of 1.2 seconds across supported chains
  • Over $40B in cumulative volume processed without loss of user deposits
  • Transfers use native assets without relying on wrapped tokens
  • No identity verification (KYC) required to bridge
  • Native token transfers avoid wrapped asset depeg risks
  • Processed over $16B in cumulative volume across 24M transactions
  • Low transaction gas fees relative to Ethereum mainnet costs
  • Requires no KYC identity verification to bridge
Cons
  • July 2026 Solana relayer exploit resulted in $3.35M in stolen relayer funds
  • Relies on third-party relayers maintaining destination chain liquidity
  • Off-chain relayer bugs can temporarily pause specific chain routes
  • ACX governance token undergoing sunsetting and corporate restructuring
  • Transfers depend on Maker liquidity pools having adequate inventory
  • Transactions can be delayed during severe destination chain congestion
  • Ecosystem utility is closely tied to the volatile OBT protocol token
Best forFast cross-chain Layer 2 bridging, DeFi traders avoiding wrapped assets, Large stablecoin institutional transfersArbitrum and Optimism users, Moving stablecoins across rollups, Developers automating cross-chain bridging

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons