Aave vs Maple Finance

How Aave vs Maple Finance compare on our ratings, lending protocol specs, funding, pros and cons.

Aave4.0/5
VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.0/54.0/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security & track record3.54.5
Rates3.54.0
Market depth5.04.5
Ease of use3.53.5
Decentralization4.53.0
Specs
KYC required No Yes
Lending modelPooledPooled
ChainsEthereum, Base, Arbitrum, Avalanche, BNB Chain, OtherEthereum
Main collateral assetsUSDC, USDT, WETH, wBTC, LINK, wstETH, cbBTC, GHO, AAVE, ETH-correlated assetsUSDC, USDT, BTC
Flash loans YesNot disclosed
Permissionless markets No No
Audited Yes Yes
Bug bounty YesNot disclosed
Governance tokenAAVESYRUP
Isolated markets Yes Yes
Real-world-asset collateral Yes Yes
Own stablecoin Yes No
RatesVariableNot disclosed
Company
Founded20172019
HeadquartersFinland—
InvestorsBlockchain Capital, Framework Ventures, Standard CryptoBlockTower Capital, Tioga Capital, Framework Ventures, Polychain Capital +13
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • $18.006B combined TVL in October 2026
  • Operates across 23 blockchain networks
  • Non-custodial wallet-based access
  • V3 includes Isolation Mode and Efficiency Mode
  • Over $4.6B in assets under management backed by overcollateralized loans
  • Maple monitors smart contract invariants every block
  • Processed over $800M in redemptions within 72 hours during the rsETH exploit
  • Regular SYRUP token buybacks funded directly by protocol cash flow
Cons
  • Variable borrowing rates can rise with market utilisation
  • Liquidation can sell collateral after health-factor deterioration
  • Smart contract and oracle risks remain
  • Collateral depends on external bridges and asset issuers
  • Liquid yield products exclude US residents and entities
  • Borrowing requires offchain compliance and institutional underwriting approval
  • Returns depend on institutional counterparty solvency rather than instant liquidations
Best forMulti-chain DeFi borrowers, Collateralised crypto lending, Stablecoin liquidity strategiesNon-US stablecoin yield seekers, Institutions seeking secured onchain credit, DeFi treasuries allocating to real yields

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons